Mistakes wallets make when designing their on-ramp flows
Dec 13, 2024
3 min reading
Onramper Editorial
When it comes to fiat on-ramping, UX is king. And while the UX of ramps providers certainly leave a lot to be desired - UI bugs, mediocre card conversion, clunky Know-Your-Customer processors - there’s also a lot that’s in control of the wallets that integrate these services.
Currency localization
Imagine going to a webstore where products are denominated in the wrong currency. You’ll think “this isn’t for me” and leave.
Yet across the top cryptocurrency wallets, it is common for fiat currencies to not be localized. In fact, in most of the top 10 wallets in the space, I had to manually try and find a way to change the fiat currency.
Some will argue that lack of localization of fiat currencies exists for privacy reasons. But users looking to buy crypto with fiat have to go through Know-Your-Customer (KYC) anyway, which includes filling in their physical address - and often even uploading their passport.
Of course, whether a ramp provider’s services can even be used depends on both fiat currency and country support, so providing a list of ramp options without localisation just results in sending users down dead paths.
Default amounts
In a number of wallets - including leading wallets like MetaMask and Phantom - the default amount displayed is 0. Have you ever wanted to buy $0 worth of cryptocurrency? Probably not.
So how should we think about default amounts?
In my view, the best way to approach default amounts is to use a round number that is higher than the median purchase.
This median changes from country to country, as the average transaction amount in Nigeria, for example, will be lower than in the United States. Therefore, the median should be determined on a country-by-country basis.
The amount displayed should adjust depending on the fiat currency, as at the time of writing every dollar is worth 1577 Nigerian Naira (not a very round number).
Payment method choice
Ask people from the Netherlands, India, Nigeria, the United States and the Philippines which payment methods they want to use to buy crypto, and each will give an entirely different answer.
Yet, the majority of the top cryptocurrency wallets do not support most of the payment methods that will be mentioned.
Other wallets have created flows with ramp providers that support many APMs, without creating a “payment method” selector. This results in the user not being able to compare the difference in price between payment methods.
In addition, any onramp provider that has more than 10 payment methods will be able to tell you how this quickly results in integrations becoming outdated, with the list of payment methods displayed to the user not reflecting what is actually supported (see below).
]Display integrations like Bitget / gate.io / Zerion / Old cakewallet flow]
Payment method localization
For those wallets that do have a range of local payment methods enabled, credit cards are often selected as the default option, despite cards having notoriously bad conversion rates when it comes to buying cryptocurrencies.
Needless to say, it is important to localise payment methods and recommend the best payment methods to users (so important, in fact, that I’ve dedicated a separate article about it here).
Closing thoughts
It is time for us to build flows users enjoy. Next week I will cover on-ramp selection in part 2 of this series.
I invite everyone - client or not - to have OnRamper analyze your app. We’ll do a free analysis to identify the good, the bad, and the ugly. Schedule a call via the link above and reply with: "Please analyze my current setup."
When it comes to fiat on-ramping, UX is king. And while the UX of ramps providers certainly leave a lot to be desired - UI bugs, mediocre card conversion, clunky Know-Your-Customer processors - there’s also a lot that’s in control of the wallets that integrate these services.
Currency localization
Imagine going to a webstore where products are denominated in the wrong currency. You’ll think “this isn’t for me” and leave.
Yet across the top cryptocurrency wallets, it is common for fiat currencies to not be localized. In fact, in most of the top 10 wallets in the space, I had to manually try and find a way to change the fiat currency.
Some will argue that lack of localization of fiat currencies exists for privacy reasons. But users looking to buy crypto with fiat have to go through Know-Your-Customer (KYC) anyway, which includes filling in their physical address - and often even uploading their passport.
Of course, whether a ramp provider’s services can even be used depends on both fiat currency and country support, so providing a list of ramp options without localisation just results in sending users down dead paths.
Default amounts
In a number of wallets - including leading wallets like MetaMask and Phantom - the default amount displayed is 0. Have you ever wanted to buy $0 worth of cryptocurrency? Probably not.
So how should we think about default amounts?
In my view, the best way to approach default amounts is to use a round number that is higher than the median purchase.
This median changes from country to country, as the average transaction amount in Nigeria, for example, will be lower than in the United States. Therefore, the median should be determined on a country-by-country basis.
The amount displayed should adjust depending on the fiat currency, as at the time of writing every dollar is worth 1577 Nigerian Naira (not a very round number).
Payment method choice
Ask people from the Netherlands, India, Nigeria, the United States and the Philippines which payment methods they want to use to buy crypto, and each will give an entirely different answer.
Yet, the majority of the top cryptocurrency wallets do not support most of the payment methods that will be mentioned.
Other wallets have created flows with ramp providers that support many APMs, without creating a “payment method” selector. This results in the user not being able to compare the difference in price between payment methods.
In addition, any onramp provider that has more than 10 payment methods will be able to tell you how this quickly results in integrations becoming outdated, with the list of payment methods displayed to the user not reflecting what is actually supported (see below).
]Display integrations like Bitget / gate.io / Zerion / Old cakewallet flow]
Payment method localization
For those wallets that do have a range of local payment methods enabled, credit cards are often selected as the default option, despite cards having notoriously bad conversion rates when it comes to buying cryptocurrencies.
Needless to say, it is important to localise payment methods and recommend the best payment methods to users (so important, in fact, that I’ve dedicated a separate article about it here).
Closing thoughts
It is time for us to build flows users enjoy. Next week I will cover on-ramp selection in part 2 of this series.
I invite everyone - client or not - to have OnRamper analyze your app. We’ll do a free analysis to identify the good, the bad, and the ugly. Schedule a call via the link above and reply with: "Please analyze my current setup."
When it comes to fiat on-ramping, UX is king. And while the UX of ramps providers certainly leave a lot to be desired - UI bugs, mediocre card conversion, clunky Know-Your-Customer processors - there’s also a lot that’s in control of the wallets that integrate these services.
Currency localization
Imagine going to a webstore where products are denominated in the wrong currency. You’ll think “this isn’t for me” and leave.
Yet across the top cryptocurrency wallets, it is common for fiat currencies to not be localized. In fact, in most of the top 10 wallets in the space, I had to manually try and find a way to change the fiat currency.
Some will argue that lack of localization of fiat currencies exists for privacy reasons. But users looking to buy crypto with fiat have to go through Know-Your-Customer (KYC) anyway, which includes filling in their physical address - and often even uploading their passport.
Of course, whether a ramp provider’s services can even be used depends on both fiat currency and country support, so providing a list of ramp options without localisation just results in sending users down dead paths.
Default amounts
In a number of wallets - including leading wallets like MetaMask and Phantom - the default amount displayed is 0. Have you ever wanted to buy $0 worth of cryptocurrency? Probably not.
So how should we think about default amounts?
In my view, the best way to approach default amounts is to use a round number that is higher than the median purchase.
This median changes from country to country, as the average transaction amount in Nigeria, for example, will be lower than in the United States. Therefore, the median should be determined on a country-by-country basis.
The amount displayed should adjust depending on the fiat currency, as at the time of writing every dollar is worth 1577 Nigerian Naira (not a very round number).
Payment method choice
Ask people from the Netherlands, India, Nigeria, the United States and the Philippines which payment methods they want to use to buy crypto, and each will give an entirely different answer.
Yet, the majority of the top cryptocurrency wallets do not support most of the payment methods that will be mentioned.
Other wallets have created flows with ramp providers that support many APMs, without creating a “payment method” selector. This results in the user not being able to compare the difference in price between payment methods.
In addition, any onramp provider that has more than 10 payment methods will be able to tell you how this quickly results in integrations becoming outdated, with the list of payment methods displayed to the user not reflecting what is actually supported (see below).
]Display integrations like Bitget / gate.io / Zerion / Old cakewallet flow]
Payment method localization
For those wallets that do have a range of local payment methods enabled, credit cards are often selected as the default option, despite cards having notoriously bad conversion rates when it comes to buying cryptocurrencies.
Needless to say, it is important to localise payment methods and recommend the best payment methods to users (so important, in fact, that I’ve dedicated a separate article about it here).
Closing thoughts
It is time for us to build flows users enjoy. Next week I will cover on-ramp selection in part 2 of this series.
I invite everyone - client or not - to have OnRamper analyze your app. We’ll do a free analysis to identify the good, the bad, and the ugly. Schedule a call via the link above and reply with: "Please analyze my current setup."
When it comes to fiat on-ramping, UX is king. And while the UX of ramps providers certainly leave a lot to be desired - UI bugs, mediocre card conversion, clunky Know-Your-Customer processors - there’s also a lot that’s in control of the wallets that integrate these services.
Currency localization
Imagine going to a webstore where products are denominated in the wrong currency. You’ll think “this isn’t for me” and leave.
Yet across the top cryptocurrency wallets, it is common for fiat currencies to not be localized. In fact, in most of the top 10 wallets in the space, I had to manually try and find a way to change the fiat currency.
Some will argue that lack of localization of fiat currencies exists for privacy reasons. But users looking to buy crypto with fiat have to go through Know-Your-Customer (KYC) anyway, which includes filling in their physical address - and often even uploading their passport.
Of course, whether a ramp provider’s services can even be used depends on both fiat currency and country support, so providing a list of ramp options without localisation just results in sending users down dead paths.
Default amounts
In a number of wallets - including leading wallets like MetaMask and Phantom - the default amount displayed is 0. Have you ever wanted to buy $0 worth of cryptocurrency? Probably not.
So how should we think about default amounts?
In my view, the best way to approach default amounts is to use a round number that is higher than the median purchase.
This median changes from country to country, as the average transaction amount in Nigeria, for example, will be lower than in the United States. Therefore, the median should be determined on a country-by-country basis.
The amount displayed should adjust depending on the fiat currency, as at the time of writing every dollar is worth 1577 Nigerian Naira (not a very round number).
Payment method choice
Ask people from the Netherlands, India, Nigeria, the United States and the Philippines which payment methods they want to use to buy crypto, and each will give an entirely different answer.
Yet, the majority of the top cryptocurrency wallets do not support most of the payment methods that will be mentioned.
Other wallets have created flows with ramp providers that support many APMs, without creating a “payment method” selector. This results in the user not being able to compare the difference in price between payment methods.
In addition, any onramp provider that has more than 10 payment methods will be able to tell you how this quickly results in integrations becoming outdated, with the list of payment methods displayed to the user not reflecting what is actually supported (see below).
]Display integrations like Bitget / gate.io / Zerion / Old cakewallet flow]
Payment method localization
For those wallets that do have a range of local payment methods enabled, credit cards are often selected as the default option, despite cards having notoriously bad conversion rates when it comes to buying cryptocurrencies.
Needless to say, it is important to localise payment methods and recommend the best payment methods to users (so important, in fact, that I’ve dedicated a separate article about it here).
Closing thoughts
It is time for us to build flows users enjoy. Next week I will cover on-ramp selection in part 2 of this series.
I invite everyone - client or not - to have OnRamper analyze your app. We’ll do a free analysis to identify the good, the bad, and the ugly. Schedule a call via the link above and reply with: "Please analyze my current setup."
More from Onramper blog
Onramping Mistakes wallets make - Part II
Dec 20, 2024
5 min reading
Bitcoin.com partners exclusively with Onramper for global APMs
Dec 20, 2024
3 min reading
Yellow Card Partners with Onramper
Nov 26, 2024
3 min reading
Onramper to Support Ramps Infrastructure for World App, Flagship Wallet of Worldcoin Ecosystem
Oct 17, 2024
3 min reading
Gate.io Enters Strategic Partnership with Onramper
Oct 15, 2024
3 min reading
Unlocking high conversions - the importance of local payment methods
Oct 4, 2024
3 min reading
The Fatal Flaw of Price-Based Rankings - Part II
Sep 13, 2024
3 min reading
The Fatal Flaw of Price-Based Rankings
Aug 30, 2024
3 min reading
Revolut joins forces with Onramper to deliver seamless fiat-to-crypto swaps
Jun 25, 2024
3 min reading
Onramper x Wallet in Telegram: building the TON onboarding rails
Jun 4, 2024
3 min reading
Onramper’s Q1 2024 roundup 🎉
May 1, 2024
3 min reading
Banxa joins forces with Onramper
Nov 14, 2023
3 min reading
How Web3 businesses can onboard more users with integrated onramps
Aug 2, 2023
3 min reading
Why use a fiat-to-crypto onramp aggregator?
Apr 25, 2023
3 min reading
Fee-based onramp routing is costing you business
Jul 24, 2023
5 min reading
Welcoming Alchemy Pay to the Onramper family
Jun 22, 2023
3 min reading
How Cake Wallet 5x'ed their onramping stack with Onramper
Jun 12, 2023
3 min reading
Six misconceptions about fiat onramp aggregators
May 30, 2023
5 min reading
What’s the best fiat onramp for crypto platforms?
May 22, 2023
5 min reading
Your guide to crypto onramps
Apr 25, 2023
3 min reading
Sushi and Onramper empower millions to buy crypto via cards, bank accounts and more
Apr 25, 2023
3 min reading
What businesses need to look for in a fiat-to-crypto onramp
Apr 25, 2023
3 min reading
Faster and more intuitive onramping widget in a new look
Jan 26, 2023
5 min reading